Summarize the action of the scene(s) and discuss how the scene fits into the play as a whole.
- This scene was really crazy and it explains that their decisions will affect them. Hamlet gets asked to have a battle with Laertes and they have a duel. During this fight, they both get injured by the poisoned sword and Gertrude dies from drinking the poisoned cup. As Laertes was dying from the position, he confesses to Hamlet that Claudius was part of this act and he acts for forgiveness. By Laertes confessions, Hamlet attacks Claudius and kills him. In a minute, Hamlet is slowly dying and he tells agora too a bunch of things and this shows his fighting spirit. Then Fortinbras comes where the hectic duel was and finds them dead. Therefore, this scene fits as a whole because Laertes dies due to his quick and thoughtless actions. Claudius finally dies and Hamlet succeeds on avenging his father. However, Hamlet dies and makes Fortinbras the new king. Also he tells Horatio to make his legacy alive and do good for the country of Denmark. As Fortinbras become the new King, this messes the Chain of Being because he is not related to the Hamlet and he is not the heir. It happened so fast that Hamlet had to make a decision for the good of Denmark and that was princely for him to do.
Provide and discuss an example of one or more of Aristotle's Principles of the Tragic Hero.
- One characteristic is Hamartia which led to a character's downfall. Hamlet fought Laertes because he was challenged and he didn't have any guilt when he killed Polonius. He changes his opinion about the situation when he was dying, he felt sorry and thought he was wrong and needed to ask for forgiveness. Hamlet was dying in the hands of his good friend Horatio and while he was dying he was telling Horatio to no commit suicide and bring his legacy to affect the future Denmark. As a prince, he still had the mind to think about the country. Also he tells Horatio to make Fortinbras the next King cause he killed Claudius. His decisions led to his downfall, but he left a legacy. One of Aristotle's Principles of a Tragic Hero is Peripeteia which is defined as a reversal of fortune. Laertes is an example of this because he made a decision that was supposed to avenge his father's death but it led to his inevitable end.
Comment on a character’s choices. Do they seem to be leading to an inevitable end?
- Laertes made an alliance with Claudius and planned to kill Hamlet with a poisoned sword. This planned came about and it was very different to what they have thought it will be. They call out Hamlet to battle with him and Laertes has all this anger in him so he could avenge his father's death. When they were fighting, Hamlet was cut, but Hamlet got Laertes, which led to his death. As he was dying, he was asking Hamlet for forgiveness and his quick thoughtless action led to his downfall. He also confesses that Claudius was part of this, which makes the scene more hectic. Therefore, he made a decision personally and followed his emotions, which got him killed.
